Re-Education Camps for Doctors, itself should be a crime!

“Re-Education Camps” for Doctors?

By ANH-USAOn 05/10/20220 Comments

“Re-Education Camps” for Doctors?

reposted here pursuant to Fair Use doctrine

Efforts are increasing to silence doctors who stray too far from the dictates of conventional medicine. Action Alerts!

“More than 2 years into this pandemic, the largest threat next to the spread of the virus itself is the spread of disinformation and misinformation.” These words were spoken by the CEO of the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), Humayun Chaudhry, DO. The statement is emblematic of the wave of censorship that has been building since the beginning of the pandemic. It is also in line with other attempts at the federal level to gag free speech about natural treatments for COVID prevention and treatment. We cannot allow these efforts to stifle the speech of doctors to succeed.

Dr. Chaudhry was referencing the FSMB’s recent approval of a medical misinformation and disinformation policy. The policy encourages state medical boards to “consider the full array of authorized grounds for disciplinary action” and not to be “dissuaded from carrying out their duty to protect the public by concerns about potential challenges to disciplinary decisions.” But don’t worry: FSMB recommends that state boards should also “consider whether there are options that do not involve disciplinary action that could help a licensee understand the ethical basis of their duty to convey accurate information to patients and the public.” This is eerily reminiscent of authoritarian “re-education” camps for doctors.

As we’ve said before: We’ve learned from the pandemic that available information can change, often quite rapidly, as with the CDC’s masking guidelines. We were also told that the virus could be spread on surfaces, then subsequent investigations revealed that the virus mostly spreads when aerosols and droplets containing the virus are inhaled. Often the “misinformation” of today becomes the established facts of tomorrow.

Further, there is a massive problem with encouraging state medical boards to initiate a campaign against “disinformation” because what constitutes “disinformation” is in the eye of the beholder; any definition will likely be vague enough to encapsulate any health information the government or state medical boards don’t like. 

We believe that Congress should pass a bill protecting doctors’ free speech rights. Just as professors are protected after they get tenured, doctors’ free speech rights should be protected after they receive their medical license.

There are certainly bad actors out there that try to make a quick buck by peddling outright falsehoods. But the many efforts at censorship seem to be geared at a subset of doctors that buck the status quo when it comes to COVID-19—either those who don’t believe in vaccinating everyone under the sun with multiple COVID vaccine shots, those who recommend common-sense vitamins and minerals for immune support, or those who believe the voluminous scientific literature on the benefits of medicines like ivermectinhydroxychloroquine, and others for the early treatment of COVID patients. We would like to think that science-based medicine can accommodate a diverse array of views, but powerful forces like the FSMB, the American Medical Association, and others seem dead-set on a one-size-fits-all approach. Deviate from their orthodoxy as a doctor, and you risk your license being suspended or revoked.

Remember, too, that the FSMB has a history of opposition to natural medicine dating back to the mid-1990s, when it discussed altering the definition of health fraud to include alternative medical care! It would appear that FSMB considers innovative approaches to healthcare to be nothing more than exercises in “quackery” and would jump at an easy chance to revoke the licenses of doctors who do not adhere to conventional medical orthodoxy—the very orthodoxy that ensures the FSMB an annual revenue of $50 million, mostly from offering credentialing services and licensing exams.

The threats to free speech are not idle. California is currently considering a bill that would allow the state medical board to discipline physicians for disseminating or promoting “misinformation” or “disinformation” as it relates to COVID-19. A federal bill would amend the law to make companies like Facebook and Twitter legally liable for promoting “health misinformation” during a declared public health emergency.

We are entering a climate where anything that challenges the government and Big Pharma’s one-size-fits all paradigm will be censored and eliminated from discourse. We cannot allow these steps towards authoritarianism to gain traction.

Some states are, unlike California, considering bills to protect free speech rights for doctors. Click the corresponding links below to take action.

  1. Oppose federal efforts at medical censorship on Twitter and Facebook.
  2. California residents, oppose AB 2098, which allows the state medical board to discipline physicians for disseminating or promoting “misinformation” or “disinformation” as it relates to COVID-19.
  3. If you live in one of the states below, click the corresponding link to support active bills that protect doctors’ free speech.

Florida
Idaho
Iowa
Kentucky
New Hampshire
Washington

4. All other states: Send a message to your legislature telling them to protect doctors’ free speech rights.

Doug Mainwaring, Far from reassuring, everything about the trio’s message is disturbing. Wed Mar 24, 2021 – 2:40 pm EST

Doug Mainwaring

Blogs

Creepiest ad ever: Clinton, Bush, and Obama want you to get the COVID vaccine

Far from reassuring, everything about the trio’s message is disturbing. Wed Mar 24, 2021 – 2:40 pm EST

Featured Image
Bill Clinton, George Bush, Barack Obama Ad Council / YouTube

WASHINGTON, March 24, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — In what is arguably the creepiest Public Service Announcement (PSA) ever foisted upon the American public, former Presidents Bill Clinton (D), George W. Bush (R), and Barack Obama (D) urge everyone to receive the coronavirus vaccine.

Far from reassuring, everything about the trio’s message is disturbing.

The 30 second PSA shows the three powerful globalists telling the entire United States population to take the untested vaccines, which are connected at least through testing to aborted fetal cells, and whose long and short term side effects — including deaths and injuries — are yet to be fully understood.

March for Life Rome.png

The shot they want you to take isn’t even technically a vaccine —it’s a form of “gene therapy” — yet that they repeatedly refer to it as a vaccine to woo you into receiving the substance into your body.

The optics are troubling: Dressed in dark winter overcoats, they each evoke the chilling image of Max von Sydow as he arrives to face the devil in the movie The Exorcist.

And where are they standing as they speak to you? In a cemetery: The PSA was filmed in the Arlington National Cemetery amphitheater. https://www.youtube.com/embed/Li-oxKhvZy0 SUBSCRIBE to LifeSite’s daily headlines U.S. Canada World Catholic

In the PSA, George Bush declares: “The science is clear. These vaccines will protect you and those you love from this dangerous and deadly disease.”

“They could save your life,” adds a feeble-appearing Bill Clinton, who once lied to the American people, saying, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman,” referring to his scandalous behavior with 22-year-old White House intern Monica Lewinsky, with whom he had indeed had sexual relations.

Barack Obama then asserts that receiving the untested shot is “the first step to ending the pandemic,” yet he is the same man whose promises regarding the so-called Affordable Care Act, better known as Obamacare, turned out to be lies.

In order to sell what became his signature policy achievement, Obama repeatedly promised, “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Period. If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep your healthcare plan. Period.” https://www.youtube.com/embed/44kyHOPEZV8

He lied to the American people time after time after time. Watch:

Obamacare has served to prove nothing more than that government-run health care is a disaster.

Why would anyone but what these men are selling?

JVM Show

“This is the least persuasive commercial in the history of mankind,” tweeted Dr. Taylor Marshall. https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1374431594933493760&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lifesitenews.com%2Fblogs%2Fcreepiest-ad-ever-clinton-bush-and-obama-want-you-to-get-the-covid-vaccine&siteScreenName=LifeSite&theme=light&widgetsVersion=e1ffbdb%3A1614796141937&width=550px

“These guys have thousands of bodies on their hands and they’re telling you what to put in your body,” noted a Twitter user. “You can’t make this up.” https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-1&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1374587131184746498&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lifesitenews.com%2Fblogs%2Fcreepiest-ad-ever-clinton-bush-and-obama-want-you-to-get-the-covid-vaccine&siteScreenName=LifeSite&theme=light&widgetsVersion=e1ffbdb%3A1614796141937&width=550px

Another Twitter user was taken aback by the line “‘it’s the first step’ in fighting the virus. After we’ve already been locked down and masked up for a year.” https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-2&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1374541545118998529&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lifesitenews.com%2Fblogs%2Fcreepiest-ad-ever-clinton-bush-and-obama-want-you-to-get-the-covid-vaccine&siteScreenName=LifeSite&theme=light&widgetsVersion=e1ffbdb%3A1614796141937&width=550px

Titled “Former Presidents and COVID-19 Vaccine Facts,” the PSA was produced by the Ad Council and COVID Collaborative.

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.

Government advises airlines to spray pesticides on passengers

Airplane passengers

(NaturalNews) Have you ever felt sick after flying, only to assume it’s jetlag or a virus you picked up from another passenger? Well, think again! You might have been exposed to an insecticide, pesticides or other toxic chemicals – deliberately used by airline staff.

(Article by Jonathan Landsman, republished from www.Naturalhealth365.com)

I think airline passengers should be outraged to know that poisonous chemicals are now being sprayed on planes regularly – DURING the flight, while travelers are inside the plane, This is true – the United States government is actually pushing this agenda of poisoning passengers.

You can’t make this stuff up: Check out this disturbing video – does this look right to you?

Reminds me of Nazi Germany: Are airplane cabins safe or a gas chamber?

This process is being referred to as “disinsection,” a word that seems to have been made up by the TSA or airline industry. Disinsection, or the spraying of an insecticide or pesticides on planes, is now permitted under international law. The Department of Transportation says that the supposed intent is to protect public health, crops and agriculture, and the environment.

The International Civil Aviation Organization and World Health Organization (WHO) admit that aircraft cabins are being sprayed with what they are calling a “fast-acting insecticide” with passengers on board, right before takeoff. Some airlines are instead treating aircraft interiors with a “residual-insecticide aerosol” right before passengers get on board.

This is truly sickening behavior: These toxic chemicals are also being applied directly to the aircraft’s internal surfaces and, to make matters worse, passengers get to breathe in this crap into their lungs.

In this next video, airline passengers are being sprayed with toxic chemicals during a flight and the airline staff person says, ‘don’t film!’ (Check out her facial expression – while spraying passengers – it says it all)

Passengers automatically agree to being sprayed with pesticides when buying airline tickets

The spraying of toxic chemicals like pesticides or an insecticide inside an enclosed, pressurized airplane cabin is beyond alarming. It is an assault on the senses and nervous systems of the passengers of the plane. Those with a pre-existing health condition or compromised immune system are even more at risk for suffering unwanted health effects.

However, all passengers exposed to these toxic chemicals “agree” to the conditions, even if they aren’t aware of it. The fact that spraying will occur on a flight is stated in the fine print when the airline tickets are purchased. Passengers implicitly agree to being sprayed just by buying a ticket for a flight where these practices will take place.
Serious health issues reported from toxic pesticides and insecticides sprayed on planes

Many airline passengers are already reporting negative health effects from exposure to toxic chemicals on flights. For example, flu-like symptoms, sinus issues, rash/hives, headaches and swollen joints are just some of the horrible effects. However, far more serious issues like acute respiratory problems and anaphylactic shock have occurred. Chronic issues affecting the neurological and immune systems have also been reported.

The most common aircraft pesticides used on airplanes are synthetic pyrethroids, specifically permethrin and d-phenothrin. Remember, they kill insects by attacking their nervous systems.

What are these chemicals doing to human nervous systems? Numerous studies have linked permethrin with Parkinson’s disease. (this has got to stop!)
Buyer beware: WHO denies health and safety issues from airline insecticides

Not surprising, at this time, the World Health Organization is downplaying the symptoms and concerns voiced by passengers. They state “there’s no evidence” that these insecticide sprays cause risk to human health, and that the sprays are safe.

The arrogance of these statements is appalling. Even a layperson knows not to use chemical sprays in an area that is not ventilated. In the short term, the only recourse is to avoid flights where this practice takes place. However, airlines should be strongly petitioned to find non-toxic methods of dealing with pests.

Bottom line: Before you take that flight – make a phone call to your airline of choice and ask the question, “are you spraying insecticides on this flight.”

Read more at: www.Naturalhealth365.com

How Long Has It Been Since Anything Was Said About Ebola? Fresh From the CDC In Atlanta: CDCEbola (Ebola Virus Disease)U.S. Healthcare Workers and SettingsPersonal Protective Equipment (PPE)


CDCEbola (Ebola Virus Disease)U.S. Healthcare Workers and SettingsPersonal Protective Equipment (PPE)
For U.S. Healthcare Settings: Donning and Doffing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Evaluating Persons Under Investigation (PUIs) for Ebola Who Are Clinically Stable and Do Not Have Bleeding, Vomiting, or Diarrhea
http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/ppe/guidance-clinically-stable-puis.html

Who this is for: Healthcare providers in the U.S. evaluating PUIs for Ebola who are clinically stable AND do not have bleeding, vomiting, or diarrhea

What this is for: Provides guidance on the processes for donning and doffing PPE for healthcare workers and staff who are evaluating a PUI who is clinically stable and does not have bleeding, vomiting, or diarrhea

How to use this, how it relates to other guidance documents: Use this guidance with frontline and assessment healthcare facilities described in Interim Guidance for U.S. Hospital Preparedness for Patients Under Investigation (PUIs) or with Confirmed Ebola Virus Disease (EVD): A Framework for a Tiered Approach. It offers step-by-step processes for donning and doffing PPE described in Identify, Isolate, Inform: Emergency Department Evaluation and Management for Patients Under Investigation (PUIs) for Ebola Virus Disease (EVD). These procedures do NOT apply to healthcare workers caring for patients with confirmed Ebola or to healthcare workers caring for PUIs who have bleeding, vomiting, diarrhea, or who are clinically unstable and/or will require invasive or aerosol-generating procedures (e.g., intubation, suctioning, active resuscitation). In those cases, use the Guidance on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) To Be Used By Healthcare Workers during Management of Patients with Confirmed Ebola or Persons under Investigation (PUIs) for Ebola who are Clinically Unstable or Have Bleeding, Vomiting, or Diarrhea in U.S. Hospitals, Including Procedures for Donning and Doffing PPE.

http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/preparing/hospitals.html

http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/emergency-services/emergency-departments.html

http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/ppe/guidance.html

Recommended PPE:

While evaluating and managing PUIs who are clinically stable and do not have bleeding, vomiting, or diarrhea, healthcare providers should at a minimum wear:

Single-use (disposable) fluid-resistant gown that extends to at least mid-calf or single-use (disposable) fluid-resistant coveralls without integrated hood
Single-use (disposable) full face shield
Single-use (disposable) facemask
Single-use (disposable) gloves with extended cuffs. Two pairs of gloves should be worn. At a minimum, outer gloves should have extended cuffs.
In this guidance, fluid-resistant means a gown that has demonstrated resistance to water or a coverall that has demonstrated resistance to water or synthetic blood. The specific test methods that assess resistance are listed in Table 1. When purchasing gowns and coveralls, facilities should follow specifications in this table to ensure they select recommended gowns and coveralls.

Table 1. Specifications for fluid-resistant gowns and coveralls
Gown Coverall
Fluid-resistant
Surgical or isolation* gown that passes:

ANSI/AAMI PB70 Level 3 requirements
or
EN 13795 high performance surgical gown
Coverall* made of fabric that passes:

AATCC 42 ≤ 1 g and AATCC 127 ≥ 50 cm H20 or EN 20811 ≥ 50 cm H20
or
ASTM F1670 (13.8kPa)
or
ISO 16603 ≥ 3.5 kPa
*Testing by an ISO 17025 certified third party laboratory is recommended

For more details, refer to technical document Considerations for Selecting Protective Clothing used in Healthcare for Protection against Microorganisms in Blood and Body Fluids, which provides a more detailed explanation of the scientific evidence and national and international standards, test methods, and specifications for fluid-resistant and impermeable protective clothing used in health care settings.

http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/protectiveclothing/default.html

http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/ppe/guidance.html

Facilities should ensure that healthcare providers are trained and able to demonstrate competency in donning and doffing recommended PPE before being allowed to care for PUIs. Facilities should also designate areas for PPE donning and doffing as specified below (for more information, refer to the Guidance on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) To Be Used By Healthcare Workers during Management of Patients with Confirmed Ebola or Persons under Investigation (PUIs) for Ebola who are Clinically Unstable or Have Bleeding, Vomiting, or Diarrhea in U.S. Hospitals, Including Procedures for Donning and Doffing PPE.

Ensure that areas for donning and doffing are separate from the patient care area (e.g., patient’s room) and that there is a predominantly one-way flow of movement of healthcare providers from the donning area to the patient care area or room to the doffing area.
Confirm that the doffing area is large enough to allow freedom of movement for safe doffing, has space for waste containers, a new glove supply, and alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) for use during the doffing process.
Donning PPE

Donning PPE – This donning procedure applies to PPE recommended for evaluating and managing PUIs who are clinically stable and do not have bleeding, vomiting, or diarrhea. There is a lower risk of splashes and contamination in these situations. An established protocol, combined with proper training of the healthcare worker (HCW), helps to facilitate compliance with PPE guidance.

Remove Personal Clothing and Items: The HCW should wear surgical scrubs (or disposable garments) and dedicated washable (plastic or rubber) footwear. No personal items (e.g., jewelry [including rings], watches, cell phones, pagers, pens) should be worn under PPE or brought into the patient room. Long hair should be tied back. Eye glasses should be secured with a tie.

Inspect PPE Prior to Donning: Visually inspect the PPE ensemble to ensure that it is in serviceable condition (e.g., not torn or ripped), that all required PPE and supplies are available, and that the sizes selected are correct for the HCW.
Perform Hand Hygiene: Perform hand hygiene with alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR). When using ABHR, allow hands to dry before moving to next step.
Put on Inner Gloves: Put on first pair of gloves.
Put on Gown or Coverall: Put on gown or coverall. Ensure gown or coverall is large enough to allow unrestricted movement. Ensure cuffs of inner gloves are tucked under the sleeve of the gown or coverall.
Put on Facemask: Put on facemask.
Put on Outer Gloves: Put on second pair of gloves (with extended cuffs). Ensure the cuffs are pulled over the sleeves of the gown or coverall.
Put on Face Shield: Put on full face shield over the surgical facemask to protect the eyes, as well as the front and sides of the face.
Verify: After completing the donning process, the integrity of the ensemble should be verified by the HCW (e.g., there should be no cuts or tears in the PPE). The HCW should be comfortable and able to extend the arms, bend at the waist, and go through a range of motions to ensure there is sufficient range of movement while all areas of the body remain covered. A mirror in the room can be useful for the HCW while donning PPE.
Doffing PPE

Doffing PPE – PPE is doffed in the designated PPE removal area in the healthcare facility. As with all PPE doffing, meticulous care should be taken to avoid self-contamination. Place all PPE waste in a leak-proof infectious waste container.

1. Inspect: Inspect the PPE for visible contamination, cuts, or tears before starting to remove. If any PPE is visibly contaminated, disinfect by using an *EPA-registered disinfectant wipe.
http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/list-l-ebola-virus.html
If the facility conditions permit and appropriate regulations are followed, an *EPA-registered disinfectant spray can be used, particularly on contaminated areas.

2. Disinfect and Remove Outer Gloves: Disinfect outer-gloved hands with either an *EPA-registered disinfectant wipe or ABHR. Remove and discard outer gloves, taking care not to contaminate inner gloves when removing the outer gloves. Dispose of outer gloves into the designated leak-proof infectious waste container.
http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/healthcare-us/cleaning/hospitals.html

3. Inspect and Disinfect Inner Gloves: Inspect the inner gloves’ outer surfaces for visible contamination, cuts, or tears. If an inner glove is visibly soiled, then disinfect the glove with either an *EPA-registered disinfectant wipe or ABHR, remove the inner gloves, perform hand hygiene with ABHR on bare hands, and don a new pair of gloves. If a cut or tear is seen on an inner glove, immediately review occupational exposure risk per hospital protocol. If there is no visible contamination and no cuts or tears on the inner gloves, then disinfect the inner-gloved hands with either an *EPA-registered disinfectant wipe or ABHR.

4. Remove Face Shield: Remove the full face shield by tilting the head slightly forward, grabbing the rear strap and pulling it over the head, gently allowing the face shield to fall forward. Avoid touching the front surface of the face shield. Discard the face shield into the designated leak-proof infectious waste container.

5. Disinfect Inner Gloves: Disinfect inner gloves with either an *EPA-registered disinfectant wipe or ABHR.

6. Remove Gown or Coverall: Remove and discard.
(a) Depending on gown design and location of fasteners, the HCW can either untie fasteners or gently break fasteners. Avoid contact of scrubs or disposable garments with outer surface of gown during removal. Pull gown away from body, rolling inside out and touching only the inside of the gown.
(b) To remove coverall, tilt head back to reach zipper or fasteners. Unzip or unfasten coverall completely before rolling down while turning inside out. Avoid contact of scrubs with outer surface of coverall during removal, touching only the inside of the coverall. Dispose of gown or coverall into the designated leak-proof infectious waste container.

7. Disinfect and Change Inner Gloves: Disinfect inner gloves with either an *EPA-registered disinfectant wipe or ABHR.
(a) Remove and discard gloves, taking care not to contaminate bare hands during removal process.
(b) Perform hand hygiene with ABHR.
(c) Don a new pair of inner gloves.

8. Remove Surgical Facemask: Remove the surgical facemask by tilting the head slightly forward, grasping first the bottom tie or elastic strap, then the top tie or elastic strap, and remove the front of the surgical facemask without touching it. Discard the surgical face mask into the designated leak-proof infectious waste container.

9. Disinfect and Remove Inner Gloves: Disinfect inner-gloved hands with either an *EPA-registered disinfectant wipe or ABHR. Remove and discard gloves, taking care not to contaminate bare hands during removal process. Dispose of inner gloves into the designated leak-proof infectious waste container.

10. Perform Hand Hygiene: Perform hand hygiene with ABHR.

11. Inspect: The HCW should inspect for any contamination of the surgical scrubs or disposable garments. If there is contamination, shower immediately, and then immediately inform the infection preventionist or occupational safety and health coordinator or their designee.

*EPA-registered disinfectant wipe: Use a disposable wipe impregnated with a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-registered hospital disinfectant with a label claim for a non-enveloped virus (e.g., norovirus, rotavirus, adenovirus, poliovirus); see EPA list of Disinfectants for Use Against the Ebola Virus at http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/list-l-ebola-virus.html.