White House Warns COVID-19 Pandemic Surges Coming Now — Centinel2012

TrialSite Staff Staff at TrialSite | Quality Journalism May. 19, 2022, 12:00 p.m. SARS-CoV- infections are rising by the day, report various sources, including the U.S. government. With warnings issued just yesterday, about a third of all Americans residing in communities have been exposed to concerning climbs in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations. Public health officials […]

White House Warns COVID-19 Pandemic Surges Coming Now — Centinel2012

Re-Education Camps for Doctors, itself should be a crime!

“Re-Education Camps” for Doctors?

By ANH-USAOn 05/10/20220 Comments

“Re-Education Camps” for Doctors?

reposted here pursuant to Fair Use doctrine

Efforts are increasing to silence doctors who stray too far from the dictates of conventional medicine. Action Alerts!

“More than 2 years into this pandemic, the largest threat next to the spread of the virus itself is the spread of disinformation and misinformation.” These words were spoken by the CEO of the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), Humayun Chaudhry, DO. The statement is emblematic of the wave of censorship that has been building since the beginning of the pandemic. It is also in line with other attempts at the federal level to gag free speech about natural treatments for COVID prevention and treatment. We cannot allow these efforts to stifle the speech of doctors to succeed.

Dr. Chaudhry was referencing the FSMB’s recent approval of a medical misinformation and disinformation policy. The policy encourages state medical boards to “consider the full array of authorized grounds for disciplinary action” and not to be “dissuaded from carrying out their duty to protect the public by concerns about potential challenges to disciplinary decisions.” But don’t worry: FSMB recommends that state boards should also “consider whether there are options that do not involve disciplinary action that could help a licensee understand the ethical basis of their duty to convey accurate information to patients and the public.” This is eerily reminiscent of authoritarian “re-education” camps for doctors.

As we’ve said before: We’ve learned from the pandemic that available information can change, often quite rapidly, as with the CDC’s masking guidelines. We were also told that the virus could be spread on surfaces, then subsequent investigations revealed that the virus mostly spreads when aerosols and droplets containing the virus are inhaled. Often the “misinformation” of today becomes the established facts of tomorrow.

Further, there is a massive problem with encouraging state medical boards to initiate a campaign against “disinformation” because what constitutes “disinformation” is in the eye of the beholder; any definition will likely be vague enough to encapsulate any health information the government or state medical boards don’t like. 

We believe that Congress should pass a bill protecting doctors’ free speech rights. Just as professors are protected after they get tenured, doctors’ free speech rights should be protected after they receive their medical license.

There are certainly bad actors out there that try to make a quick buck by peddling outright falsehoods. But the many efforts at censorship seem to be geared at a subset of doctors that buck the status quo when it comes to COVID-19—either those who don’t believe in vaccinating everyone under the sun with multiple COVID vaccine shots, those who recommend common-sense vitamins and minerals for immune support, or those who believe the voluminous scientific literature on the benefits of medicines like ivermectinhydroxychloroquine, and others for the early treatment of COVID patients. We would like to think that science-based medicine can accommodate a diverse array of views, but powerful forces like the FSMB, the American Medical Association, and others seem dead-set on a one-size-fits-all approach. Deviate from their orthodoxy as a doctor, and you risk your license being suspended or revoked.

Remember, too, that the FSMB has a history of opposition to natural medicine dating back to the mid-1990s, when it discussed altering the definition of health fraud to include alternative medical care! It would appear that FSMB considers innovative approaches to healthcare to be nothing more than exercises in “quackery” and would jump at an easy chance to revoke the licenses of doctors who do not adhere to conventional medical orthodoxy—the very orthodoxy that ensures the FSMB an annual revenue of $50 million, mostly from offering credentialing services and licensing exams.

The threats to free speech are not idle. California is currently considering a bill that would allow the state medical board to discipline physicians for disseminating or promoting “misinformation” or “disinformation” as it relates to COVID-19. A federal bill would amend the law to make companies like Facebook and Twitter legally liable for promoting “health misinformation” during a declared public health emergency.

We are entering a climate where anything that challenges the government and Big Pharma’s one-size-fits all paradigm will be censored and eliminated from discourse. We cannot allow these steps towards authoritarianism to gain traction.

Some states are, unlike California, considering bills to protect free speech rights for doctors. Click the corresponding links below to take action.

  1. Oppose federal efforts at medical censorship on Twitter and Facebook.
  2. California residents, oppose AB 2098, which allows the state medical board to discipline physicians for disseminating or promoting “misinformation” or “disinformation” as it relates to COVID-19.
  3. If you live in one of the states below, click the corresponding link to support active bills that protect doctors’ free speech.

Florida
Idaho
Iowa
Kentucky
New Hampshire
Washington

4. All other states: Send a message to your legislature telling them to protect doctors’ free speech rights.

World Health Organization is “tip of the spear” for global tyranny

UN whistleblower says World Health Organization is “tip of the spear” for global tyranny

Wednesday, May 04, 2022 by: Ethan Huff
Tags: Astrid Stuckelbergerbadmedicinebadsciencebig governmentconspiracycorruptiondeceptionenslavedfascismfreedomglobal tyrannyinfectionsLibertyoutbreakPlandemicscience fraudUNWhistleblowerWHO

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-05-04-un-whistleblower-who-tip-spear-global-tyranny.html

Bypass censorship by sharing this link:

New

Copy URL

4,590VIEWS

Image: UN whistleblower says World Health Organization is “tip of the spear” for global tyranny

(Natural News) Epidemiologist Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger appeared on an episode of “Conversations That Matter” with The New American magazine’s Alex Newman to discuss the World Health Organization (WHO), a product of the United Nations that she says represents the “tip of the spear” for global tyranny.

Right now, the WHO is attempting to usurp for itself even more power over the world with a new international health regime proposal that would grant the entity more control over public health.

Stuckelberger had been working directly with the WHO throughout the plandemic to form public health policy, and what she saw during that time with the push towards global totalitarianism apparently shocked her, causing her to become a whistleblower.

One major thing she took issue with was the use of PCR tests, which are not meant to be diagnostic tools. Stuckelberger says it was “very strange” that these were used since they have “no validity” in verifying the presence of covid disease.

“We have never seen that in the WHO that the test and the diagnostic technology – it’s not a diagnostic actually; it’s a technology for research that suddenly becomes the tool of the world the tool of WHO to prove ‘cases,’ and ‘cases’ were transformed into sick people, and contagious, and asymptomatic … and that was one thing that was very disturbing.”

Stuckelberger went on to discuss how the WHO was “creating fear” from the very beginning, which violates the WHO’s own 2005 International Health Regulations, which task the entity with communicating ethically, not for shock value to push some ulterior agenda. (Related: The WHO is also involved in bioweapons research.)

Until it is proven to exist, there is no such thing as “covid,” scientifically speaking

Even though SARS-CoV-2 has never been isolated, purified or analyzed, the WHO ran with the lockdown narrative almost immediately out of the gate. And much of the world followed suit, especially throughout the West.

The WHO’s power and influence in this regard is why Stuckelberger says that the WHO is the “tip of the spear” of a global tyranny matrix in which all member countries just obey without question.

“WHO gave directives that were totally non-commensurate with the research,” Stuckelberger says.

“They did not give the data that there is a causality between a coronavirus and the sickness, which usually you have to purify, take pictures of, study and replicate in animals … and we never had this.”

Stuckelberger says that normally there is an extensive process involved with identifying a perceived threat and determining the risks involved. Instead of going through that process, the WHO just went ahead and promoted lockdowns and the halting of the global economy.

“What you basically have to do is not stop commerce and trade, and not lock down people immediately – that’s the thing to avoid,” she says. “Everything looked very suspicious to me from the beginning.”

“The house of cards is falling down, and what we do will echo after that,” Stuckelberger says.

There were many red flags right from the start that caught Stuckelberger’s attention. And as she put the pieces together, she came to the realization that fraud was more than likely involved with the WHO’s plandemic response.

“The more you put the pieces together, the more (you see that) it’s deliberate,” she says. “And now we have the proof from the U.S. that it has leaked from a Wuhan lab – it didn’t actually leak, though, it was an intentional spread.”

Be sure to check out the full interview with Stuckelberger and Newman at The New American website.

More related news can be found at Fascism.news.

Sources for this article include:

TheNewAmerican.com

NaturalNews.com

The Determination By US Govt. to Abolish Clean Meat:

Amish organic farmer faces hefty fine, jail time for producing CLEAN MEAT

Sunday, May 01, 2022 by: Ramon Tomey
Tags: agricultureAmish farmerAmos Millerbadfoodbig governmentchemical free meatchemicalsCitric Acidclean foodfood scienceGMOhealth freedomlactic acidLibertylivestockorganic farmingorganic meatperacetic acidsynthetic preservativesTyrannyUSDA

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

Bypass censorship by sharing this link:

https://citizens.news/615131.html

New

Copy URL

11KVIEWS

Image: Amish organic farmer faces hefty fine, jail time for producing CLEAN MEAT

(Natural News) An Amish organic farmer is facing a hefty fine and a prison term for the simple crime of producing clean meat.

Amos Miller runs a holistically managed farm in Bird-in-Hand, Pennsylvania, where he breeds cows, chickens and pigs. The animals in his century-old farm are bred without the use of chemicals and medications mandated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). According to Miller, he raises his animals in the way he believes God intended them to be raised – in accordance with nature.

However, a federal judge ordered the Amish farmer to cease and desist all sales of his organic meat. This same magistrate also ordered Miller to pay $250,000 for “contempt of court” last summer. He added that the farmer needs to pay an initial $50,000 as a “good faith” payment to avoid jail.

To make matters worse, armed U.S. marshals raided his property, farm store and freezers at the behest of the federal judge. They took an inventory of all his meat to ensure he will no longer be able to sell or slaughter any more animals. (Related: Small town business owner spent 7 years building up organic meat company, only to be shut down by village board.)

Miller, who runs a private members-only food distribution network, alleged that the federal government is prosecuting him for practicing his religious freedom in the way he raises and prepares food. “Our members don’t want any of that. They want fresh, raw meat with no additives. Our members want it straight from the farm with no preservatives on it.”

The members of Miller’s private food club agree, saying they do not like their grass-fed meat laced with chemical preservatives mandated by the USDA. Numbering around 400, they have also signed contracts that state their awareness of the meat not being processed in USDA-inspected plants or treated with preservatives.

USDA prefers people eat chemicals instead of clean foods

According to Miller, all USDA-licensed processing plants are required to treat all meat – regardless of whether they are organic or grass-fed – with synthetic preservatives.

“Often, they use citric acid, which you’d think comes from oranges or lemons. But it’s a modified substance made from corn, and they don’t even have to label it on the meat,” he explained.

A customer who handles the Amish farmer’s website and other modern communications concurred with him, saying: “The USDA processing plants require the meat to be treated with a chemical cocktail of citric acid, lactic acid and peracetic acid. The peracetic acid is toxic, and the citric and lactic [acids] are GMO.”

Anke, another customer of Miller, pointed out that the lactic acid used to preserve meat is not a natural version. “It’s not lactic acid coming from the fermentation of sauerkraut. It’s all created in a dish in a lab,” she said. “It’s a synthetic sterilizer that causes many health problems.”

According to Miller, he and other small farmers would still be nearly impossible to make a profit – thanks to giant meat companies acting as middlemen. Furthermore, the exorbitant costs of obtaining a USDA meat processing license make matters worse.

The Amish farmer lamented: “The rules and regulations are such that you have to get into [a] $100,000 debt before you ever sell your first pound of meat – and the market’s not guaranteed. There’s no option for farmers to start small, and add on and buy equipment as they can.”

“[We have to] either get a license or go out of business. Our position is we’d rather go out of business because their rules and regulations are too hard to follow. We have many small farmers in our area that would love to be farmers, but the business has gotten so monopolized.”

Anke agreed with Miller, saying that ultimately, “it’s all about profit and money.” She added: “They want a monopoly on beef, pork and poultry. They are basically saying ‘Unless you go through federal inspection, you are making people sick.’”

CleanFoodWatch.com has more stories about Miller and other small farmers being prosecuted for offering clean, chemical-free meat.

Watch this video explaining what the USDA’s “certified organic” label really means.

https://www.brighteon.com/embed/33a27bb5-92d5-44e0-8add-caf616a190a6

This video is from the Corruption Exposure channel on Brighteon.com.