ARLIN REPORT THOUGHT OF THE DAY: ERA OF DISTRUST

Arlin Report

When you combine years of BS, lying and sprinkle in corruption from career politicians and corporate America, add a touch of liberal elements like Hollywood and piss poor news agencies….mix it all together you have a recipe of an Era of Distrust.   It’s as if it has all come together to destroy the quality of life in America, destruction of a nation.  Shame on us for listening and supporting this crap.

It is difficult to believe anything anymore.  I can not stand to turn on the news networks,  national or local for that matter.   I look at commentators with spite.   They are all after that airtime, I’ll be the one to break this story and it matters not that it is true, false or simply made up.   Until someone can disprove it, it works for me.

A nation has lost its integrity because of it!

View original post

Soros to Be Booted out of His Native Hungary As Trump takes office Hungarians plan to get their hands dirty


http://russia-insider.com/en/soros-be-booted-out-his-native-hungary/ri18464

Hungary sees Trump coming to power in the US as an opportunity. An opportunity to come down hard on each and every organization in the country funded by Hungarian-born American billionaire George Soros.

Szilard Nemeth, the deputy head of the ruling Fidesz party of Prime Minister Viktor Orban told reporters Hungary must use “all the tools at its disposal” to “sweep out” NGOs funded by Soros, which “serve global capitalists and back political correctness over national governments”.

“I feel that there is an opportunity for this, internationally,” because of Trump’s election, he added.

The country’s legislature is scheduled to debate a proposed law that would allow authorities to audit NGO executives.

What Pisses Me Off About The “F@&K White People” Chicago Kidnapping Stefan Molyneux — tomfernandez28’s Blog

Da Negist13 hours ago (edited) CNN and the Chicago PD are already saying it wasn’t a hate crime and that he was targeted because of his mental handicap. Aleksandra Ostrowska14 hours ago This is what happens when the media pretends blacks can’t be racist. adobo77714 hours ago Funny, I don’t see this on any […]

via What Pisses Me Off About The “F@&K White People” Chicago Kidnapping Stefan Molyneux — tomfernandez28’s Blog

America’s Nuclear Submarines Now Obsolete? – new Swedish Technology

https://nuclear-news.net/category/1-nuclear-issues/

submarine,-nuclear-underwatDid Sweden Make America’s Nuclear Submarines Obsolete? The National Interest, 30 Dec 16 Nuclear-powered submarines have traditionally held a decisive edge in endurance, stealth and speed over cheaper diesel submarines. However, new Air Independent Propulsion (AIP) technology has significantly narrowed the performance gap on a new generation of submarines that cost a fraction of the price of a nuclear-powered boat……..

Nuclear vs. AIP: Who Wins?:

Broadly speaking, how do AIP vessels compare in performance to nuclear submarines?  Let’s consider the costs and benefits in terms of stealth, endurance, speed and cost.

Stealth:

Nuclear powered submarines have become very quiet—at least an order of magnitude quieter than a diesel submarine with its engine running.  In fact, nuclear-powered submarines may be unable to detect each other using passive sonar, as evidenced by the 2009 collision of a British and French nuclear ballistic missile submarines, both oblivious to the presence of the other.

However, there’s reason to believe that AIP submarines can, if properly designed, swim underwater even more quietly. The hydraulics in a nuclear reactor produce noise as they pump coolant liquid, while an AIP’s submarine’s engines are virtually silent. Diesel-powered submarines can also approach this level of quietness while running on battery power, but can only do so for a few hours whereas an AIP submarine can keep it up for days.

Diesel and AIP powered submarines have on more than one occasion managed to slip through anti-submarine defenses and sink American aircraft carriers in war games. Of course, such feats have also been performed by nuclear submarines.

Endurance:

Nuclear submarines can operate underwater for three or four months at a time and cross oceans with ease. While some conventional submarines can handle the distance, none have comparable underwater endurance.

AIP submarines have narrowed the gap, however.  While old diesel submarines needed to surface in a matter of hours or a few days at best to recharge batteries, new AIP powered vessels only need to surface every two to four weeks depending on type. (Some sources make the unconfirmed claim that the German Type 214 can even last more than 2 months.) Of course, surfaced submarines, or even those employing a snorkel, are comparatively easy to detect and attack.

Nuclear submarines still have a clear advantage in endurance over AIP boats, particularly on the long-distance patrols.  However, for countries like Japan, Germany and China that mostly operate close to friendly shores, extreme endurance may be a lower priority.

Speed:……..Obviously, high maximum speed grants advantages in both strategic mobility and tactical agility.  However, it should be kept in mind that even nuclear submarines rarely operate at maximum speed because of the additional noise produced.

 On the other hand, an AIP submarine is likely to move at especially slow speeds when cruising sustainably using AIP compared to diesel or nuclear submarines.  For example, a Gotland class submarine is reduced to just 6 miles per hour if it wishes to remain submerged at maximum endurance—which is simply too slow for long distance transits or traveling with surface ships.  Current AIP technology doesn’t produce enough power for higher speeds, and thus most AIP submarines also come with noisy diesel engines as backup.

Cost:

Who would have guessed nuclear reactors are incredibly expensive?  The contemporary U.S. Virginia class attack submarine costs $2.6 billion dollars, and the earlier Los Angeles class before it around $2 billion in inflation-adjusted dollars.  Mid-life nuclear refueling costs add millions more.

By comparison, AIP powered submarines have generally cost between $200 and $600 million, meaning a country could easily buy three or four medium-sized AIP submarines instead of one nuclear attack submarine. Bear in mind, however, that the AIP submarines are mostly small or medium sized vessels with crews of around 30 and 60 respectively, while nuclear submarines are often larger with crews of 100 or more.  They may also have heavier armament, such as Vertical Launch Systems, when compared to most AIP powered vessels.

Nevertheless, a torpedo or missile from a small submarine can hit just as hard as one fired from a large one, and having three times the number of submarine operating in a given stretch of ocean could increase the likelihood chancing upon an important target, and make it easier to overwhelm anti-submarine defenses.

While AIP vessels may not be able to do everything a nuclear submarine can, having a larger fleet of submarines would be very useful in hunting opposing ships and submarines for control of the seas. Nor would it be impossible to deploy larger AIP powered submarines; China has already deployed one, and France is marketing a cheaper AIP-powered version of the Barracuda-class nuclear attack submarine.

It is no surprise that navies that operate largely around coastal waters are turning to cheap AIP submarines, as their disadvantage are not as relevant when friendly ports are close at hand. ……..http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/did-sweden-make-americas-nuclear-submarines-obsolete-18908?page=2

January 2, 2017 Posted by | Sweden, techno